Hartford Business Journal

March 21, 2016

Issue link: https://nebusinessmedia.uberflip.com/i/654846

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 23

www.HartfordBusiness.com March 21, 2016 • Hartford Business Journal 15 Hartford Democrat Sen. John Fonfara. Businesses and nonprofits are already raising concerns about the prospects of higher taxes or fees, warning that any attempts to increase the cost of doing busi- ness in Hartford may unwind progress the city has made in recent years attracting new development, residents and businesses. But businesses also say they understand the city's fiscal outlook, which Bronin recent- ly described as dire, signaling they may be willing to pitch in if there's shared sacrifice. The proposal calls for the city to enter into negotiations with an unspecified number of the largest not-for-profit property owners and commercial taxpayers. Also unspecified is whether a surcharge or PILOT fee would be mandatory, and what percentage or amount each group would be asked to contribute. An initial leaked draft of the bill published by Hartford blogger Kevin Brookman, which was different from the proposal submitted to the legislature, called for a surcharge as high as 10 percent on the city's 20 largest commercial taxpayers and a maximum 10 percent PILOT fee on Hartford's 15 largest not-for-profits. Eversource, Travelers, The Hartford and Aetna are among the city's largest taxpayers and would be likely targets for the surcharge. Hospitals and colleges, including Hartford Healthcare, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center and Trinity College, are among the city's largest not-for-profits. Bronin said "the proposed bill would establish the legal authority for assessing PILOT payments and a surcharge, but the bill also makes clear that the process is meant to be as collaborative as possible." The city's largest property owners "have a stake in a strong, successful Hartford, and all we can promise is a city that's managing its fiscal crisis honestly, transparently, and doing every- thing possible to build our future on a strong foundation," the first-term Democrat said. Bronin gave a blunt assessment of the city's finances in his State of the City speech last week, likening Hartford to a household that had taken out a second mortgage and maxed out its credit cards. Debt service and pension costs are rising, and the city can't count on a state bailout. Hartford faces a $9 million deficit in the fiscal year ending June 30, and a $32 million deficit next fiscal year. The bill now before the legislature would also create a "financial sustainability com- mission," consisting mainly of Hartford offi- cials and appointees, to oversee budgeting, borrowing, union contracts, pensions and other matters. Ruffled feathers The surcharge and PILOT program pro- posals aren't new for Hartford. A 2012 attempt by former Mayor Pedro Segarra to do the latter, when the city was facing a $56 million deficit, was unsuccessful. Meantime, Hartford commercial property owners paid a 15 percent surcharge for more than two decades, something they fought against for years until the legislature elimi- nated it in 2012. It was created to ease the tax burden on the city's homeowners, who have benefited from an artificially lowered proper- ty tax rate over the years. Hartford's current 74.29 mill rate is the highest in the state. Sev- enty percent of a commercial property's fair market value is taxed at that rate, while only about 32 percent of a residential property's value gets taxed at 74.29 mills. Businesses have pushed for the city to bring those assessments back to parity as quickly as possible. MetroHartford Alliance CEO Oz Griebel said that a return to a mandated surcharge, which he fought for years, "truly would send [the city] backwards." But he said he also understands the city's fiscal woes. To go along with a tax surcharge, businesses would need to know there's buy-in from both not-for- profits and residential taxpayers, he said. "The solution here has to be comprehen- sive in the sense that everybody has to under- stand not only the scope of the problem … but the specifics of the solution … how long those specifics have to be in place, and what the pro- jected and anticipated outcome is," Griebel said. "You don't go after one segment of proper- ty owners without them knowing what you're going to ask the other property owners to do." Christopher Ostop, senior vice presi- dent/broker for commercial realty adviser Jones Lang Lasalle, said reviving the sur- charge would threaten to stall or undo Hartford's recent gains in luring suburban corporate tenants to downtown buildings. "I think [Bronin] understands,'' Ostop said, "that the burden can't be 100 percent borne by the corporations in downtown Hartford. We've got to figure out a way to cure that budget deficit while not putting the whole burden on businesses in downtown Hartford who are part of the solution of the Capital City's revitalization.'' New York City landlord Yisroel Rabinow- itz owns several downtown Hartford proper- ties: The Grand apartments and ground-floor retail space at 201 Ann St.; and 11 Asylum St., which houses Burger King and the Hartford Parking Authority, among other tenants. Rabinowitz said he would unwelcome any city proposal that involves raising taxes on its commercial landholders, which most likely would force him to raise rents for his downtown commercial and residential tenants. "I definitely understand where the mayor is coming from," Rabinowitz said, "but I believe that is not the direction to go into.'' Rabinowitz noted that he went under contract recently to acquire 275 Asylum St., which houses High School Inc. and a Frank- lin Trust Federal Credit Union branch. "I'm trying to show my belief in downtown,'' he said. "I hope the city doesn't come back and contradict my belief in what the city will be.'' Aetna spokesman Walt Cherniak said the insurer is concerned about anything that might raise the cost of doing business in Hartford. "If a property tax surcharge is proposed, we would expect that it would be part of an overall plan to get Hartford back on firm fis- cal grounds, and that the state would find opportunities to offset this increased cost in other places," Cherniak said in an email. Meanwhile, several major not-for-profit property owners, including St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center and Hartford Healthcare, declined comment on the PILOT proposal. Trinity College spokeswoman Kathy Andrews said school officials have dis- cussed the proposed PILOT with Bronin. "The bill that will be considered by the state legislature could have serious ramifi- cations for the fiscal health of our college, but we are committed to working toward solutions that sustain our relationship with the city and the significant community investments Trinity College makes that are a direct benefit to the city and our neighbor- hood," Andrews said. "We recognize the fiscal crisis facing Hartford and the limited revenue options available to the city." She added that Trinity is also subject to its own financial constraints, and that added costs can lead to higher tuition. A potential PILOT program would come just as hospitals and nonprofits face state funding cuts, likely increasing their hesitation to cough up more money to the city. In 2012, nonprofits largely rebuffed demands from the city to make voluntary PILOT payments. n LET'S TALK ABOUT HOW WE CAN HELP YOUR BUSINESS MAKE IT BUILD IT BUY IT LEASE IT MOVE IT GROW IT EDUCATIONAL PLAYCARE Financed the expansion of day care centers across the state CADCO, LTD Financed acquisition of major equipment DOYLE'S MEDICAL SUPPLY Maintaining a long-standing business relationship www.nwcommunitybank.com Member FDIC Equal Housing Lender Contact Steve Zarrella Senior Vice President & Chief Lending Officer 860-379-7561 zarrella@nwcommunitybank.com YOUR COMMUNITY – YOUR COMMUNITY BANK FOR OVER 150 YEARS Move your plans from the drawing board into action. You know your business— and we know ours. Together we can make things happen. NCB COMMERCIAL HBJ 1-4pV_Layout 1 3/2/16 1:23 Tax-Base Disparities This chart shows the number, percent and total value of tax-exempt properties in a number of cities and towns in Connecticut. It demonstrates how Hartford is at a disadvantage with a significantly higher percentage of tax-exempt properties than all other municipalities. Tax-exempt % Value of Share parcels of total exempt parcels of total LARGE CITIES Hartford 1,455 6.4% $3,758,739,591 59.1% Bridgeport 1,895 5.5% $3,093,950,038 33.9% SMALL CITIES Manchester 597 3.2% $449,156,340 11.9% Torrington 386 2.6% $223,370,750 12.3% WEALTHY SUBURBS Glastonbury 558 3.9% $249,554,640 6.7% Litchfield 282 6.2% $149,668,630 13.9% MIXED BASE Hamden 551 2.8% $723,993,227 16.6% Windsor 448 3.7% $264,333,790 10.3% RURAL Killingly 274 3.7% $179,443,790 15.1% Union 85 11.6% $9,941,520 11.3% S O U R C E : C O N N E C T I C U T T A X S T U D Y P A N E L , 2 0 1 5 from page 1 Hfd. weighs fiscal options

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Hartford Business Journal - March 21, 2016