Worcester Business Journal

November 23, 2015

Issue link: https://nebusinessmedia.uberflip.com/i/604056

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 24 of 27

www.wbjournal.com November 23, 2015 • Worcester Business Journal 25 Central Mass. needs to be on the mind of Life Sciences Center E D I T O R I A L The Worcester Business Journal welcomes letters to the editor and commentary submissions. Please send submissions to Brad Kane, editor, at bkane@wbjournal.com. T he Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce works to recruit, retain and incubate businesses in the region. We must understand the region's assets and market for business looking to move or expand. To that end, the chamber commissioned a report to identify Worcester's fiber network assets and to seek suggestions for improvement. Released on Nov. 5, the Worcester Fiber Connectivity Report details the key elements available to consumers today as well as suggested steps to ensure growth and connectivity to pockets of the city that may lack access to the fiber network. The three growth sectors identified in the 2013 Worcester Regional Economic Competitiveness Outlook report released by the Worcester chamber detailed the three highest growth sectors: professional, scientific and technical; education and health; and manufacturing. All require high capacity bandwidth. Worcester has the key elements necessary to support high-tech businesses, including Worcester's greatest asset, the ability to offer unlimited Internet speeds through fiber. Roughly 495 of the 20,000 cities and towns in the U.S. have a broadband network. A small percentage of these have a fiber network, and an even smaller number of municipalities have a multitude of lit fiber providers and vendors willing to lease dark fiber to commercial consumers. Worcester's infrastructure has all that. Fiber networks are attractive to business tenants, developers and landlords because it offers unlimited speed and capacity and is essentially "future proof." We see it in property values. A building with dark fiber generally has a higher property value for a few reasons. First, the number of Internet provider options from which tenants can select increases and competition drives prices down. Secondly, dark fiber provides unlimited bandwidth assuring tenants the flexibility and scalability they may need. Finally, lit fiber allows tenants to access unlimited speeds without having to manage the connection or equipment. Worcester has two dark fiber providers with networks in the city, 11 service providers with fiber and 20 providers with service delivery ability. Along with the fiber assets, Worcester has a carrier hotel in the center of the city, eight data centers within 20 miles, and direct connections to Boston, Hartford and New York City. The chamber and other stakeholders are committed to improving the city's infrastructure and expanding economic development efforts. Since the release of the report, additional plans have been solidified to expand the fiber network to the Worcester Regional Airport and construction has begun to bring fiber to more than 50 schools. The chamber has asked the city to consider establishing a team to streamline the workflow for permitting and fiber development. We have suggested that a Fiber Accessibility Task Force be created to encourage collaboration between the small and large business community, city departments, higher education and the service provider community to open the lines of communication. Finally, the chamber has asked to work with the city to draft and advocate for policies that integrate fiber into infrastructure improvement plans. In the ever-changing world of technology, promoting and expanding Worcester's fiber infrastructure is crucial to the chamber's recruit, retain and incubate strategy. n Timothy P. Murrary is president and CEO of the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce. Worcester needs fiber to expand business options BY TIMOTHY P. MURRAY Special to the Worcester Business Journal V I E W P O I N T Timothy P. Murray L aunched in 2008 with much fanfare by the Patrick Administration, the Massachusetts Life Science Center -- a 10-year, $1-billion investment in catalyzing growth in the life science industry in the state -- has achieved some measurable success. Some seven years later, Massachusetts is an undisputed leader in the life sciences field with 15 of the top 20 global leaders in biopharma having a presence in the state. Who are the clear winners so far after $595 million of the $1 billion has been committed by the Life Sciences Center? Kendall Square in Cambridge has become the hotbed as new development has continued unabated while rents have reached numbingly high levels. Its clearly the place to be, and companies have been more than willing to pay the premium for a Cambridge address. Second, the state university system has been a direct beneficiary, as some $200 million to date have been allocated to building infrastructure. The largest single grant was $90 million in funding for the $400-million Albert Sherman Center at UMass Medical School, which opened in 2013, bringing the total invested from the Life Sciences Center to Central Massachusetts in to roughly $140 million. A new administration in the governor's office has also brought change to the leadership of the Life Science Center as long time director Dr. Susan Windham-Bannister, who left in June, has recently been replaced by Travis McCready, a former executive at the Boston Foundation. Will the remaining funds be gobbled up largely in greater Boston, or can the Central Mass. region, which has much to offer and much to gain from leveraged investments in the life sciences, get its fair share of the pie? The initial read from McCreary is that the Baker Administration is deliberately looking to spread the wealth and invest the remaining funds throughout the state -- and clearly has Central Mass on its radar. One of the strategies is to leverage the huge presence of biotech leaders already with research facilities in the Boston area to create manufacturing jobs in lower-cost centers throughout the state where there is already a skilled workforce. Combined with Worcester's already growing research strength at UMass Medical School, WPI and other academic institutions, the region stands to benefit from both kinds of job growth. In McCready's interview with WBJ Digital Editor Sam Bonacci, the new director was very enthusiastic about Central Massachusetts' prospects at being a life science hub as the state's initiative moves into its second phase. While we are pleased with the what he is saying, actions -- particularly the kind that send more state money to the region -- always will speak louder than words. How the remaining $405 million from the original $1 billion dollar promise is spent remains to be seen. Some critics have pointed out that government should not be in the business of picking winners and looser industries, and that incentives for R&D and infrastructure, and tax credits should be offered to a broader base of industries rather than exclusively to the life sciences. Afterall, growing one industry at the cost of diminished jobs in another key sector can prove to be a zero sum game. However, the Baker administration now seems ready to stay the course with the center, so now it is up to the political, educational and industry leaders from Central Massachusetts to make their strongest case for further investment. One significant advantage that our region continues to have is a lieutenant governor with strong ties to the region. Worcester's Tim Murray was involved in the original legislation, and today Shrewsbury's Karyn Polito remains a strong in watching out for the interests of Worcester and the region. In addition, a focused legislative delegation needs to help advocate for further leveraging the growth that is happening through Massachusetts Biomedical Initiatives incubator programs, the many related life science programs at the region's colleges and universities, the recent relocation of GE's Healthcare Life Sciences division to Marlborough, and more. Central Mass does not have the concentrated cluster of jobs that the Cambridge area does, but it nonetheless stands to see significant growth from an industry that has already has a strong foothold on the region. Lets hope the new leadership and renewed focus at the Life Sciences Center add up to real job growth across the state. n

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Worcester Business Journal - November 23, 2015