Mainebiz

May 4, 2015

Issue link: https://nebusinessmedia.uberflip.com/i/503901

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 12 of 31

I N S I D E T H E N OT E B O O K W W W. M A I N E B I Z . B I Z 13 M AY 4 , 2 0 1 5 How does limiting debate on TPP trade agreement serve the public? I n October 2011, more than a year before his election as Maine's junior U.S. senator, Angus King wrote a commentary for Bowdoin College's student newspaper suggesting that free trade isn't always what it's cracked up to be. He takes aim at the Trans- Pacifi c Partnership, the largest proposed free trade agreement in history that's now in the fi nal stages of negotiations between the United States and 11 Pacifi c Rim countries. Here's what King wrote: "Imagine the governor of one of our states going to the Congress and making the following argument: 'We are a small state that is struggling economically; we're predominantly rural and would like to expand our manufacturing base. But it's hard because we're subject to those onerous federal environmental laws, which make building factories more expensive, as well as those pesky federal safety and wage and hour laws, which drive up the cost of labor. 'So we would appreciate it if you would exempt us from all those laws; then, we could attract jobs from the rest of the United States and sell our prod- ucts for less than what they would cost to make in the other states. Consumers in the other states would get cheaper goods and we'd get lots of new jobs. And maybe, eventually, our economy will improve to the point where we can buy stuff from the other states as well. So how about it?' Sound preposterous? Absolutely; the guy would be laughed out of Congress and not even get through the door at the White House. And yet, this is essentially what hap- pens when we sign a free trade agreement with another country, especially one with minimal environmental and labor laws. In terms of trade and access to our markets they are, in eff ect, becoming states — no tariff s, no borders, no hassles —but very special states, indeed, exempt from the rules that apply to their competitors unlucky enough to still be located in one of the original ." Unfortunately, those musings aren't preposterous. at scenario has been playing out in secret TPP negotiations, with Vietnam seeking the elimina- tion of tariff s designed to protect the few remaining shoemakers left in the United States, most notably 850-plus workers at New Balance's Maine fac- tories in Norridgewock, Skowhegan and Norway and another 500 workers at the Boston-based company's two factories in Massachusetts. Vietnamese shoemakers make an average of $90 to $129 a month, about 38% of what shoemakers in China now make. Vietnam is now the world's No. 2 shoemaker after China. In anticipa- tion that the TPP will, in fact, eliminate footwear tariff s, the footwear industry is accelerating the movement of manu- facturing facilities into Vietnam. Nike Inc., the world's largest shoemaker, had sales last year of $27.8 billion, a 10% gain. According to its website, it has 333,591 workers at 67 factories in Vietnam, with 39% of them making footwear. Nike wants the footwear tariff s eliminated. New Balance workers make $12 to $14 per hour with benefi ts — earning more in one day than Vietnamese shoemak- ers earn in one month. New Balance, which makes 25% of its shoes in the United States, doesn't want the foot- wear tariff s eliminated. Under the fast track bill now being debated in D.C., the Obama admin- istration wants Congress to allow the president to fi nalize the still-secret TPP deal and present it to lawmakers for an up-or-down vote later this year. If Congress acquiesces, and lifting tariff s on Vietnamese-made shoes is part of the deal, there'd be no real debate over how that might impact Maine's econ- omy that already has lost more than 30,000 manufacturing jobs since the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement was adopted in 1994. ere'd be no chance to amend thousands of pages negotiated in secret, including a provi- sion leaked to the New York Times and published in March that would allow multinational corporations to challenge any domestic law — not in a U.S. court, by the way — that hurts their profi ts. If Congress grants fast track provisions of limited debate and no opportunities for amendments when a trade agreement negotiated in secret eventually comes up for a vote, doesn't it seem preposterous to call the pro- cess democratic? J a m e s M c C a r t h y , Mainebiz senior writer, can be reached at j m c c a r t h y @ m a i n e b i z . b i z and @ J a m e s M a i n e b i z . www.momentumconvention.com Tuesday, November 10 9:00am–4:00pm | Augusta Civic Center I N T E R E S T E D I N PA R T I C I PAT I N G ? Call Donna Brassard at 207.761.8379 x327 FOLLOW US @MBEVENTS #MOCO15 Be part of Maine's largest business-to-business event and network with customers and prospects. Space is limited, reserve early! Reserve your exhibit space now! PAV IL ION SP ONSOR: TD Bank REMO T E OF F ICE LOUNGE SP ONSOR: Portland International Jetport E XCLUSI V E V ENDOR SP ONSORS: Affordable Exhibit Displays | Broadreach Public Relations Headlight Audio Visual | Time Warner Cable | W.S. Emerson Company M O M EN T U M CO N V EN T I O N 2015 ACADIA SP ONSOR: SEBAGO SP ONSOR:

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Mainebiz - May 4, 2015