QRCA Views

QRCA VIEWS-03.2015

Issue link: https://nebusinessmedia.uberflip.com/i/482881

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 55

30 QRCA VIEWS SPRING 2 0 15 www.qrca.org Quallies, Take Your Mark, Get Set, GO! C O N T I N U E D Challenges Occur when Recruiter(s) Don't Effectively Manage the Process. Tell participants it's a video interview • Show rates tank when participants aren't clearly informed that a project requires the use of a webcam (not just the possession of one). Recruiters are often so focused on finding people who meet target specifications that they overlook the need to clearly discuss the technology require- ments for online interviews. • Craft a screener that clearly states the recruitment objective upfront (e.g., "We are looking for people to take part in a one-hour webcam interview.") and follow it up with a question regarding their com- fort with webcam technology (e.g., "Do you have a computer with a webcam you are comfortable using for a one-hour, uninterrupted interview?"). After the demographic/psychographic screening questions, wrap up with a webcam inter- view closing, terminating any respondents who don't have a webcam hooked up to their computer, who haven't used their webcam in the past month, or lack confi- dence using their webcam for research purposes. Explain to participants that they might be "paid and sent" • Over-recruiting is common and helps mitigate the risk of a poor show rate and allows for the intended "sample size" to be achieved. With webcam research, there isn't a waiting room with a hostess to explain to participants that they aren't needed for a project, even though they might be prepared. Subsequently, when they worry about getting paid, they start to question the technician at a critical time in the research process – at the start of the discussion! • Design a talking piece for potential participants that explains the reason for over-recruiting and the process for receiv- ing an honorarium in the event they are not needed for a project at the last minute. Or, have an alternate/junior moderator standing by so that they can jump onto the platform and conduct a smaller session with "secondary" participants (for a mini- mal additional cost), giving additional insight and experience to a moderator-in- training. Verify that participants will be joining at a quiet time and space • Nobody – a moderator, clients, or other participants – can easily focus on the content when someone joins a web- cam conversation in a distracting envi- ronment. Kids interrupting, dogs bark- ing, a participant constantly getting up to do something are all disruptions to the research akin to a participant's phone ringing in the middle of an in-person focus group. • Prepare a plan to minimize real time disturbances. Clearly articulate in the recruitment and/or confirmation process the need for a distraction-free environ- ment. Select a day prior to the research to test participants' webcam environment and see if it meets the "distraction-free" requirement. You might need to offer more incentive to a particular participant if they need to seek an alternative environ- ment the day of the groups. Don't let yourself trip over the hur- dles in webcam interviewing. With proper planning, and well-managed expectations in the field, you'll not only gain momentum with your online research effort, but will also persevere to the finish line.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of QRCA Views - QRCA VIEWS-03.2015