Issue link: https://nebusinessmedia.uberflip.com/i/1547355
account details. Standard safeguards, including check and payee positive pay, ACH positive pay, dual control, and multi- factor authentication cost little and close real gaps. Staff should be trained to recognize scams, including callers who spoof legitimate numbers and impersonate bank employees by name. 5. Choose a banking partner who stays proactive, and test that relationship periodically. Confirm that your bank coordinates across cash management, wealth services, and commercial lending, including municipal bonds and tax-exempt financing, so your municipality works with one team that has a full financial picture rather than several disconnected ones. There are plenty of respected national institutions, but the right partner is one whose bankers intimately understand state and local requirements, check in before something falls through the cracks, help identify the next tool or efficiency worth adopting, and are genuinely invested in your community. It's also reasonable, and healthy, to periodically go out to bid, compare vendors, and confirm every partner is delivering full value. Cash management may not be the most visible part of running a town, but it directly shapes what a community can afford to do for its schools, infrastructure, public safety and its residents. Municipalities that treat it strategically end up with more room to invest in what matters most. Rethinking Cash Management: Five Moves Every Connecticut Municipality Should Consider W hile they both aim for operational efficiencies, cost controls and the need to balance a budget, running a town has pressures a corporate CEO doesn't face. Every dollar a city or town holds belongs to its residents. It's tax revenue, state aid, earmarked project funds, money that has to be secure, accessible when it's needed, and put to work as effectively as possible on behalf of the community. That responsibility, and the scrutiny that comes with it, is what sets municipal cash management apart. A private business making a capital decision typically needs sign-off from a handful of people. A municipality often needs a vote: taxpayers weighing in, quite literally, on their own money. When you factor in state statutes, local finance policies, and conservative rules around allowable investments, it's easy to see why municipal finance officers operate with less flexibility and more layers of approval than their private-sector counterparts. The past year has made this more pronounced. Joe DeLong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities, has called it the toughest local budget cycle many officials have faced yet. Federal pandemic relief funds that cushioned town budgets for years are largely spent, while health insurance and electricity costs have climbed sharply, leaving the same reliance on property taxes, which fund more than 70% of the average local budget, to cover a bigger bill. None of that means municipalities are without options. It means the options need to be used more deliberately. In my years working in cash management with municipalities across Connecticut, here are five ways local finance officials can take a more strategic approach. 1. Put idle cash to work without sacrificing liquidity. Municipal cash flow can be highly seasonal with tax collection cycles, month-end inflows, and state aid disbursements that create predictable peaks and valleys. The opportunity sits in the peaks. That's why it's wise to consider a sweep arrangement that moves excess funds automatically into an interest-bearing account and sweeps them back the moment they're needed, so nothing sits idle and nothing is tied up. For money that's more clearly earmarked, such as a trust or a distant capital project, a short-term CD or similarly conservative vehicle can capture a better return without compromising safety. It starts with an honest conversation about each account: what the money is for, how long it can sit, and what return is realistic given those constraints. 2. Let technology do the heavy lifting. Every municipal payment typically requires signatures and every process that still runs on paper is slower and more exposed to error. Automating signature workflows and receivables saves staff time and gets funds moving faster in both directions. The same logic applies to how residents pay their bills. Online payments and direct deposit settle faster and more reliably than paper checks, which can bounce, get mis- keyed, or take longer to clear, which poses serious issues when the money belongs to the public. 3. Get ahead of the shift to paperless. As more of the payment ecosystem, including potentially the Federal Reserve, moves toward paperless processing, that change will eventually work its way down to local government. Municipalities that start driving taxpayer adoption of online payments now, rather than waiting, will make an easier transition when paper-based processing is no longer the default. 4. Treat security and fraud prevention as non-negotiable. Each year, finance officers should have their bank confirm how their deposits are insured since products and policies change. Fraud protection deserves equal attention. Municipalities are frequent targets for check fraud and business email scams, in part because of a high volume of public checks and payments that expose By Jennifer Yergeau, FVP Head of Government & Institutional Banking at PeoplesBank